Employers put a great deal of time and energy into candidate engagement. Even in a slower hiring market, where many roles attract more applicants than recruiters can review, candidate expectations remain high.
Yet our latest research shows that effort isn’t translating into a better candidate experience. In PeopleScout’s Inside the Candidate Experience 2026 report, featuring data from a global survey of more than 1,000 job seekers across 10 markets, just 11% of candidates rated their experience as very positive, down from 18% in 2023. Ghosting was a big part of the problem, with 64% of candidates hearing nothing back from more than half of the employers they applied to. Employers that want better outcomes across their hiring programs need to rethink how they engage candidates.
That challenge grows when permanent and contingent hiring run as separate processes, because candidates can have very different experiences depending on the type of role they apply for. Organizations are starting to close the gap. Everest Group research shows nearly half of enterprises are now actively working to unify their permanent and contingent hiring strategies. With economic uncertainty continuing and many employers relying on contingent talent to respond to shifting demand, that work is becoming more pressing. A total talent acquisition strategy, encompassing both full-time and contingent hiring, can help organizations reduce agency costs and fill the roles the business needs most.
In this article, we’ll look at how siloed permanent and contingent hiring affects the candidate experience, share best practices that work across both worker types, and explain what to look for in a total talent partner.
A tale of two candidate journeys: permanent and contingent workers
Permanent hiring typically involves thorough vetting, with recruiters responsible for moving candidates through the process. Contingent hiring often includes more stages and handoffs as suppliers pass candidates to hiring managers, and it’s sometimes decentralized, with each department managing their own hiring.

Ownership is split, too. Typically, procurement leaders oversee contingent labor spend, while talent acquisition leaders look after full-time hiring. As a result, a candidate applying for a permanent role and a contractor applying for a temporary assignment at the same organization may go through entirely different processes, with different contacts, timelines, and levels of communication.
The importance of a total talent acquisition strategy
To the business, the need is usually simple: hire the right talent to get the work done. Recruitment, however, usually isn’t organized that way. As the two journeys above show, permanent and contingent hiring often run as separate processes. When both sides compete for the same talent pool, the costs can add up.
- Both sides may pay a premium to reach the same candidates.
- Each side may advertise, source, and screen for similar roles separately.
- A strong candidate turned down for a permanent role often isn’t considered for a contract assignment—the same is true in reverse. In both cases, talent you’ve already paid to attract is lost.
The cost can also extend well beyond the hiring program. In our 2026 research, 37% of candidates who had a negative experience said they would tell others not to apply, and 36% said they would stop buying from the company. For consumer-facing businesses with large contingent workforces, a poor experience for one group of workers can quickly become a brand reputation problem.
A total talent acquisition strategy brings permanent and contingent hiring together under one view of demand. Organizations can start with the work that needs doing and then find the best route to the right talent, rather than deciding first whether a role should go to an employee or a contractor. Just as important, every candidate gets a consistent experience of your brand, however they come to you. That consistency is the foundation for better candidate engagement.
How to improve engagement for every candidate
So, how do you create an engaging candidate experience that gives both full-time and contingent candidates what they want? The fundamentals are largely the same, whatever the worker classification. In our 2026 research, candidates ranked respect for their time (4.36 out of 5), a transparent process (4.28), and fair assessment (4.27) as the most important parts of the hiring journey. In practice, that means holding contingent hiring to the same standard as full-time recruitment.
Let candidates drive the process
Wherever possible, candidates should be able to move themselves through the hiring process, whether they’re applying for a permanent position or a three-month contract. Self-service steps like mobile applications, text-based screening, and automated interview scheduling can reduce the friction that leads to drop-off. For contingent workers—who are often on tighter timelines and evaluating multiple immediate opportunities—speed and self-service are crucial to securing top talent before a competitor does.
Focus on your candidates, not your company
Start by thinking about the specific talent personas you’re targeting. Your recruitment marketing campaigns and job postings should feature thoughtful messaging that highlights what’s in it for them. A contractor may care most about pay transparency, speed to placement, project scope, and flexibility, while a permanent candidate may focus more on career growth, culture, and benefits. Tailoring your messaging helps both groups feel understood.
Make your career site work harder for you
Your career site is often where candidates decide whether to apply at all, yet contract roles may only be advertised through staffing suppliers. Unifying your career site to showcase both permanent and contingent opportunities helps reduce confusion.
Ensure the site is easy to navigate and eliminates duplicate postings. For example, a retailer hiring full-time and part-time seasonal staff across multiple locations should make it clear whether applying to one role opens consideration for others. Adding FAQ content that outlines the application process for both permanent roles and contingent assignments gives every applicant confidence upfront.
Streamline interviews
The shelf life of an engaged candidate is short. While permanent roles typically involve thorough, multi-stage vetting, contingent hiring often gets bogged down by multiple handoffs between staffing suppliers and internal department managers. Match your interview stages to the role type. Using pre-recorded video interviews or automated scheduling tools helps you connect with candidates quickly, preventing contractors and full-time applicants alike from getting lost in scheduling delays.
Keep candidates informed at every stage
Our research found communication was one of the weakest-performing parts of the candidate experience. While TA teams often have automated communication set up for permanent hires, contingent candidates rely on staffing suppliers to keep them updated, and standards can vary widely from one supplier to the next. A few best practices can help:
- Set clear expectations about timelines and next steps at the point of application.
- Deploy automated status updates by text and email, and set the same communication standards for your staffing suppliers.
- Close the loop with every candidate, including contract workers who weren’t selected. A contractor who isn’t the right fit for one assignment could be exactly the talent you need for the next.

Build pathways between contingent and permanent roles
A total talent approach works best when talent can move between worker types. A contractor who performs well on assignment already knows your organization, your teams, and the work, which can make them a strong candidate for a permanent role.
Direct sourcing can make those moves easier. Rather than relying on staffing suppliers to find talent for each role, you use your existing talent database to build and engage talent pools for both permanent and contingent roles. Those pools can include former employees and contractors, referrals, and strong runners-up from past searches. Because these candidates are already familiar with your organization, you can often fill roles faster.
Three steps can help you get started:
- Keep talent pools engaged between roles with regular, relevant communication, so candidates stay connected to your brand until the next opportunity opens.
- Give contractors visibility of permanent openings and a clear route to apply.
- Track contractor performance so hiring managers can identify strong candidates for permanent roles.
Choosing a total talent partner for better candidate engagement
Executing a unified recruitment strategy across talent acquisition and procurement, two functions that have historically worked separately, isn’t easy. Coordinating technology, aligning processes, and shifting organizational mindsets often require specialized expertise. That’s why many organizations choose to work with a total talent partner.
When evaluating a partner to help achieve your total talent goals, three things matter most.
- Dual-market expertise: Look for a partner with a clear view of both permanent and contingent hiring along with demonstrated success in your specific labor categories. They should have the market intelligence required to map candidate personas across both talent pools to effectively identify, engage, attract, and retain talent.
- A unified tech stack: Your partner should offer talent technology that balances sourcing, AI, and automation to move candidates smoothly through the funnel—regardless of worker classification—while keeping candidates informed and ensuring humans remain in control of every hiring decision.
- Customized total workforce solutions: A partner should create a solution unique to your business, combining approaches like direct sourcing, internal mobility, and employer branding to bring your permanent and contingent talent strategies together.

See how this works in practice
When a global food manufacturer brought permanent and contingent hiring under one total workforce strategy with PeopleScout, it filled about 40% of staffing requests the same day and cut compliance deficiencies by 91%. Read the case study.
